Data Centers are the Hottest Market in Construction. But are They Your Market?

Data Centers are the Hottest Market in Construction. But are They Your Market?

by David Morton, Maxim Consulting Group

 

Every subcontractor in America is hearing some version of the same advice right now, “Get into mission critical!”

The pull is real, and the numbers back it up. In the 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook from AGC and Sage, 65 percent of contractors expect the data center market to expand over the coming year, while just 8 percent expect it to contract. That nets out to a +57 percent positive outlook, the strongest reading of any sector they track. Deloitte credits AI driven data center and energy work for the bulk of the modest growth forecasted in 2026, while commercial and residential markets remain soft.

So one market is shouting, “Look at me!” while the rest of the board goes quiet. That is exactly the moment contractors tend to make their worst decisions.

Know Your Capabilities First

Michael Porter offered one of the clearest definitions of business strategy in his 1996 Harvard Business Review piece aptly titled “What is Strategy?” The answer was refreshingly simple. “Strategy means performing different activities than your rivals do, or performing similar activities differently.”

For subcontractors, that becomes a question of identifying what types of buyers they are built to serve. Picture two glazing contractors. One thrives on fast-track curtain wall projects for commercial developers while the other focuses on meticulous historic restorations for institutions. Both hang glass, but they are very different businesses with vastly divergent capabilities.

Segmentation means identifying the buyers for whom you are the obvious solution, rather than trying to adapt your talents to be a potential solution for everyone else. Most subs hate that idea, because narrowing their focus feels like turning away revenue. But a firm that looks like everybody else competes on price alone, and in this business that means competing on whose estimator made the biggest mistake.

That brings us to core competencies. I had the good fortune of learning from renowned business strategist C.K. Prahalad at The University of Michigan, coauthor of Competing for the Future. One of his ideas has guided me ever since, “Core competencies are the wellspring of new business development.” Know your capabilities first. The markets you can effectively serve will follow.

Four Directions, Four Different Risks

Once you know your competencies, the standard product market map sorts your options fast (Figure 1). Existing services to existing clients is penetration. Safe harbor, best return on effort, lowest risk.

New, but related services to existing clients is product development. The relationship and the credibility already exist, so you are only adding adjacent scopes. For most subs this is the best path to growth, because the hardest part of construction sales is building trust, and that work is already done.

Existing services to new clients is market development, the same scope sold to unfamiliar buyers or new geographies. New services sold to new clients is full diversification, the riskiest of the four because you are building both new capabilities and new relationships at the same time.

So Where do Hyperscale Opportunities Sit?

McKinsey projects global data center capacity demand could nearly triple by 2030, approaching 219 gigawatts, with AI workloads driving 70 percent of it. Now the constraints. Lead times for generators, chillers, transformers and switchgear have more than doubled since 2019, and grid interconnection waits now extend into months and in some cases years, both of which create massive liquidated damages exposure. Further, the pool of subs with the in-house talent, process discipline, bonding capacity and balance sheets are highly limited.

Put it together and here is the honest read. For most subcontractors, hyperscale work sits in the bottom right quadrant disguised as a top left opportunity. New buyer, new buyer behavior. No tolerance for schedule failure. Often new geography. Sometimes new scope. It is a real adjacency only if you already self-perform the work and already serve owners who buy on schedule certainty instead of low price. High temptation, but higher risk for most.

Math > Hope

Before you chase any new segment, score it (Figure 2). Insist on a stable core with real earnings opportunity that won’t absorb significant management capacity from the work that is already paying your overhead. Put the downside in dollars. Write the exit plan before you need it.

Figure 2:

Let’s face it, the vast majority of subcontractors have no business pursuing large scopes in the data center world. For most, pursuing data centers should not mean mission critical MEP packages but more modest scopes like site work, fencing, fireproofing, low voltage or commissioning support. The better opportunities are often on the back end of these projects: retrofit, power & cooling upgrades and service work in facilities already operating.

Then there is customer concentration risk. Let one owner grow past roughly a quarter of your revenue and the character of your company changes to the needs of that client whether you intend it to or not. Pricing discipline slips, receivable risk can pile up, and your ability to walk away from bad terms evaporates right when you need it most.

Contract language creates other challenges, deliberately allocation risks through broad form hold harmless, advance lien and bond waivers, and pay if paid provisions. Read the terms with the same discipline as a scope review. On some jobs none of it is worth signing, no matter whose logo sits on the letterhead. Decide your walking away point before negotiations start.

 

Build Your Competencies and Let Them Open Your Markets

The real constraint right now is capability, not appetite. ABC projects the industry needs roughly 349,000 net new workers in 2026 just to hold even, while AGC found that 82 percent of firms are struggling to fill craft positions. The subs winning this work are rarely the boldest entrants, but rather the ones who have already built sustainable capability and capacity. Five differentiators can do most of the heavy lifting in opportunity creation.

Design build and preconstruction. Research published by DBIA projects design build will approach half of all US construction spending by 2028, and most of it is awarded on qualifications and best value rather than low number. A sub that can carry design responsibility for its own scope, price it early and defend it in a room full of engineers is no longer competing on whose estimator erred the most.

Service and special projects. CFMA benchmarking puts specialty trade net margins near 7 to 8 percent against 4 to 5 percent for general contractors, and service and special projects pricing is better than new construction because the customer is seeking solutions to urgent problems rather than shopping for the lowest bid. Master service agreements create a revenue floor, provide pull through project work in a low competition setting, and increase the company multiple the day you sell it.

Vendor and manufacturer partnerships. Remember that equipment lead times have more than doubled. In the right circumstance, an OEM relationship provides something better than a discount, a scheduling advantage. Vendor certifications and a preferred position on a procurement list can matter more to a general contractor than your unit price.

Certifications buyers demand. Fit-out operators commonly require BICSI credentialed installers on low voltage scopes. Electrical acceptance testing runs through NETA. Commissioning, which on a mission critical job means integrated systems testing at full load rather than a punch list, runs through credentials such as BCxP, ACG and NEBB. Under all of it sits prequalification filters: a current ISNetworld or Avetta profile, an EMR an owner will accept, and bonding capacity with headroom.

Prefabrication and work packaging. Research from the Construction Industry Institute at the University of Texas at Austin found that teams using advanced prefabrication and kitting saw roughly 25 percent productivity improvement and 10 percent lower total installed cost, with better predictability on both cost and schedule. Prefabrication and modular assembly move labor off crowded sites and into controlled shops.

None of these capabilities belong to a single market. They travel into health care, commercial, industrial, institutional, semiconductor and yes, mission critical. That is Prahalad’s test made practical. Build a robust business strategy by developing competencies that open several markets, contribute to what customers value, and are difficult to imitate.

The hyperscaler gigawatts are real. So is the graveyard of contractors who ventured into a market before they identified the reasons to avoid it.

About the Author

David Morton is COO & Director with Maxim Consulting Group, where he works with construction firms of all sizes on organizational assessments, business planning, leadership development, executive coaching, and productivity improvement. David spent nearly 30 years in the construction and manufacturing industries before joining Maxim. David holds a Class A General Engineering Contractor’s License and a Class B General Building Contractor’s License, an MBA from the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, and a BA in Economics from the University of California, San Diego. He is a published industry researcher and a frequent presenter at industry conferences and forums. He can be reached at david.morton@maximconsulting.com.

Posts Carousel

Latest Compass Articles

Latest Webinars

Most Commented

Featured Videos